Edit Template

The New Standard in School Security: Best Practices for Hardening Vulnerable Access Points 

Educational security has changed considerably in recent years, with new threats emerging, both digital and physical. Yet despite the increased awareness and investment, many school leaders discover that their security still contains critical gaps.

The issue tends to stem from a common blind spot: while main entrances receive appropriate attention and resources, secondary access points like car parks, storage facilities or sports hall entrances remain surprisingly vulnerable.

School gates
Wreake Valley Academy Main entrance – credit:iStock.com

The solution lies in what security professionals call “hardening”, the process of making every aspect of your building structurally resistant to forced entry, not just the obvious points of access.

All buildings need protection to some degree against criminal activity, but intruders tend to select targets where their attacks will inflict the most damage and impact, which puts schools at risk. For this reason, hardening vulnerable but often overlooked points is essential.

Identifying and auditing high-risk access points

The first step to effective security hardening is carrying out a vulnerability audit. More in depth than a cursory inspection, this requires a detailed walkthrough to identify every possible entry point throughout the building that might be less obvious but are just as vulnerable to a break-in.

Think ground-floor windows in older wings that might not be used as much, flat roof access points near bin stores, service doors ticked behind outbuildings, or delivery entrances that are frequently used but maybe not as supervised.

You also want to map out where key assets are stored throughout the site. Where does your school store high-value IT equipment? Which buildings house specialist sports apparatus or maintenance tools? These locations demand maximum protection because they’re primary targets for both opportunistic theft and planned intrusion. You can then overlay your asset map with your access point inventory to prioritise security investments where they deliver greatest impact.

Best practices solutions for physical hardening

Large apertures are a particular challenge in educational settings. Sports hall entrances, maintenance garages, and delivery points often feature substantial openings that can’t be secured properly with conventional doors. These locations demand purpose-built solutions such as high-grade roller shutters.

As the experts at CDC Garage Doors explain: “One of the biggest security advantages of roller shutter garage doors is that they form a sturdy physical barrier when closed. The interlocking metallic slats are typically made from robust aluminium or galvanised steel, which is challenging to cut through or pry open.”. Properly specified industrial shutters withstand repeated daily use while still maintaining their security integrity over many years of service.

Installing anti-shatter film to windows and glass doors provides an economical first line of defence, making rapid entry for intruders considerably more difficult and time-consuming. Likewise, for IT suites and equipment stores, fixed or barriered windows eliminate vulnerabilities entirely and keep that all-important natural light.

Finally, fire escape doors are a common challenge and require mechanisms that ensure they remain secure when they’re not in emergency use but still function flawlessly when they’re needed. Modern panic hardware and alarmed systems resolve this problem perfectly.

Perimeter security also deserves renewed attention during any hardening programme. Gates and vehicular access points need to meet the same exacting standards you’ve applied to pedestrian entrances, and CCTV systems need to be kept up to date, and equipment maintained for reliability. Inconsistency in boundary security undermines your investments elsewhere, as intruders naturally gravitate towards the weakest point in your defences.

Integrating physical security with operational flow

Physical barriers alone can’t deliver the level of security educational facilities need without operational protocols paired with them. Tiered access control ensures that staff members can only enter the areas appropriate to their roles.

For example maintenance personnel require access to plant rooms and storage facilities that teaching staff never go into, and cleaners need different permissions again. Modern access control systems manage these distinctions seamlessly through role-based permissions to keep the building secure without hindering employees’ ability to do their jobs.

On a similar note, traditional key management creates obvious vulnerabilities in educational settings. Keys can easily be lost, copied without authorisation, or inherited by staff who have changed roles or left employment. Switching to digital locking systems that track usage seamlessly provide significantly improved security for those hidden areas that get overlooked, and have the added bonus of simplifying admin. When combined with access control policies, they create an auditable trail that enhances accountability and rapidly identifies security breaches.

Finally, operational continuity demands that the security measures you implement accommodate the realities of daily school life without creating bottlenecks, frustration or compliance issues. For example, you want to combine robustness with reliability, which demands materials like steel and GRP for high-traffic areas, that can withstand constant use without deteriorating or needing constant maintenance. Doors, locks, and technology implementation also needs to satisfy fire safety regulations and local authority requirements too.

Security hardening is a task that delivers substantial operational benefits over its lifetime. Certainly, there are the obvious safeguarding advantages for staff and students alike, but properly hardened facilities also typically qualify for reduced insurance premiums. They also incur significantly lower repair costs following security incidents. When this is evaluated across a ten or fifteen-year span, the financial case becomes compelling independently of security considerations.

By Dakota Murphey

View our technical brochures here:

Rompa Catalogue 2025 

Edit Template
Wernick Buildings

Subscribe to the QA Education Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with QA Education by subscribing to our monthly newsletters!

QA Education is GDPR compliant

Follow us!

Edit Template

QA Education is provided be Euromedia Associates Ltd
UK Registered Company Address: 10 Ashfield Rd, Chorley, PR7 1LJ

Tel: 01257 267677  Email: hello@euromediaal.com
Registered Company No: 02662317 VAT Registration No: GB582161642

Euromedia Associates Publishers of QA Education Magazine
35 years
Guaranteed Royal Mail distribution
Royal mail

Website and all content Copyright © 2025 Euromedia Associates Ltd All Rights Reserved.