The National Society for Education in Art and Design Survey Report 2015-16

 

The detrimental consequences of government policy on art, craft and design education have been exposed by the findings of The National Society for Education in Art and Design Survey Report 2015-16 to be launched at the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Art, Craft and Design in Education at 4pm on Tuesday 9 February 2016.

Commenting ahead of NSEAD’s report launch, Sharon Hodgson MP, Chair of the All- Party Parliamentary Group for Art, Craft and Design in Education, said:

“Nurturing creativity and opening the minds of our children and young people to different horizons should be an important part of any child's or young person’s education, and the provision of high-quality art and design education is an important way of doing just that.

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_large","fid":"249","attributes":{"class":"media-image aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7907","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"300","height":"201","alt":"5"}}]]

That is why it is vital that art and design teachers receive the recognition and support they deserve from policy-makers and the Government so that they can educate future generations with the creativity, talent and skills to drive our economy in the 21st century.”

NSEAD’s 2015-16 survey report findings show that in the last five years government policies have impacted not only on the value of the subject, but on the time and resources needed for children and young people to participate and excel in art, craft and design. These changes, evidenced throughout NSEAD’s report, are reducing opportunities and choices to engage in a broad and balanced curriculum and risk jeopardising and limiting the UK as a creative and competitive force in a global market.

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_large","fid":"250","attributes":{"class":"media-image alignleft size-medium wp-image-7909","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"225","height":"300","alt":"P1010191"}}]]

We cannot ignore the voice of our teachers, explicit in the survey.

Survey report key findings include:

Curriculum time and provision for art and design is being significantly eroded across all five key stages

‘Pupils can no longer cover all the basic skills and so enter GCSE unprepared for the rigor, independence and skill required.’ Survey respondent

‘There has been a narrowing of the range of media that students will work with particularly impacting upon 3D teaching, Textiles and other applied Arts disciplines.’ Survey respondent

The value given to art and design in schools and colleges is impacting on choice and provision of art and design qualifications offered for both higher and lower ability students

‘Many parents believe that the curriculum is an entitlement and that their children will have a choice.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_large","fid":"251","attributes":{"class":"media-image alignright size-medium wp-image-7910","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"300","height":"201","alt":"12"}}]] This survey report comes at such a crucial time for art craft and design education. With findings that indicate a context of increasing misunderstanding and less regard for art craft and design education, the arts and technology.’ Ged Gast, NSEAD President

Primary and secondary teachers have limited or no access to high-level subject-specific professional development in art and design

‘High level subject specific continuing professional development is key to addressing recruitment and retention issues within the education profession and to the quality of teaching and learning in formal and informal education.’ NSEAD Manifesto for Art, Craft and Design Education

There has been an erosion of teachers’ wellbeing and an increase in workload

The reduced profile and value of the subject has contributed to art and design teachers leaving or wanting to leave the profession

‘Art is not valued by the management team.’ Survey respondent

Survey report recommendations:

Alongside findings from the survey NSEAD has provided a series of recommendations. This is a national challenge and we are asking the DfE, parents, head teachers and school governors, Ofsted, higher education institutions and the Arts Council to act now and reverse these consequences with immediate effect. Our recommendations include:

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_large","fid":"252","attributes":{"class":"media-image alignleft size-medium wp-image-7908","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"300","height":"225","alt":"P1010179"}}]]Schools should review the time allocated for the teaching and learning of art and design within the curriculum, adjusting the mechanisms and barriers that deplete time resulting in damage to standards in art and design, in primary schools and through carousel systems, shorter lessons and compressed key stage 3.

Parents should, through membership of parent teacher associations and as parent governors, hold the governance and management of the school accountable for the appropriate time, resources, facilities and value given to art and design on the curriculum and in the professional development of its teachers and support staff

The Department for Education should decline from stating or inferring that higher education and career opportunities will be limited by examination study in art and design, thus misrepresenting the subject to parents and young people.

The full survey report can be downloaded: nsead.org/downloads/survey.pdf

 

Categories